Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Elementary Reconfiguration

Effective & Efficient Use of District Resources

  • November 28, 2005
2
Elementary Reconfiguration
3
Elementary Reconfiguration
4
Elementary Reconfiguration
5
Elementary Reconfiguration
6
Elementary Reconfiguration
7
Elementary Reconfiguration
8
Elementary Reconfiguration
9
Elementary Reconfiguration
10
Elementary Reconfiguration
11
Elementary Reconfiguration
12
Elementary Reconfiguration
13
Elementary Reconfiguration
14
Since the Elementary Reconfiguration study began, major context shifts have occurred that have significantly impacted our thinking, work, and considerations.
15
"Enrollment"
  • Enrollment
  • Personnel
  • Facilities / Operations
  • Financial Outlook
16
K-5 Enrollment
  • At the beginning of the study, we identified declining and fluctuating enrollments.
17
 
18
Declining Enrollment Continues in 05-06
19
A Deeper Analysis of Elementary Enrollment Trends
  • 1964-1984 (6,820 students to 4,058)
    • Millikin Elementary closed in 1979
    • District rebalanced the entire elementary program by closing two schools, moving the 6th grade to the middle schools, and redrawing boundaries in 1984-85
    • Beginning in 1985-86 eight elementary schools served 3,529 students in grades K-5.

20
 
21
A Deeper Analysis of Elementary Enrollment Trends
  • Since 1985-86  enrollment has dropped from 3,529 to 2,712 (October, 2005) resulting in the loss of 817 students.


  • More than 50% of the loss has occurred during the past three years !





22
In other words:
  •    We have experienced a decline of 432 K-5 students since the Elementary Reconfiguration Study began.
23
 
24
 
25
Personnel
  • There are 128 regular education classes across 8 elementary buildings in  grades K-5.
    • 37 have class sizes with fewer than 20 students
    • 3 classes have enrollments of 26/27 students





26
Personnel
  • There are 48 grade levels (K-5 x 8 schools)
  •    13 of the 48 only have 2 classrooms per   grade level
  • Implication:  50 students/2 teachers =             class size of 25
  •     Add 5 new students:
  •     55/2 = class size of 27 and 28
  • Adding a teacher results in class sizes of 18, 18, and 19


27
Personnel
  • There are 48 grade levels (K-5 x 8 schools)
  •    13 of the 48 only have 2 classrooms per   grade level
  • Implication:  50 students/2 teachers =             class size of 25
  •     Add 5 new students:
  •     55/2 = class size of 27 and 28
  • Adding a teacher results in class sizes of 18, 18, and 19


  • Result: Inefficient use of personnel




28
Personnel Implications
  • Two section grade levels increase the probability of adding staff during a period of continued declining enrollment.
  • Increased reliance on traveling special area teachers.
  • Decreased likelihood of collaborative planning & flexible student groupings.
  • Inequitable distribution of resources (i.e. counselors, psychologists, gifted, etc.)





29
Personnel Implications
  • Two section grade levels increase the probability of adding staff during a period of continued declining enrollment.
  • Increased reliance on traveling special area teachers.
  • Decreased likelihood of collaborative planning & flexible student groupings.
  • Inequitable distribution of resources (i.e. counselors, psychologists, gifted, etc.)




  • Result: Inefficient use of personnel.





30
 
31
 
32
COMPARISON EXAMPLE:


CH-UH Enrollment(6384)   x   185/Next lowest Sq. Ft. per child   =   1,181,040 (equivalent Sq. Ft of facilities)

This would represent a net reduction of our District facilities by 254,093 Sq. Ft.

Our average elementary school size is 69,000 Sq. Ft.

Our average middle school size is 124,000 Sq. Ft.




NOTE:  Millikin building represents 54,680 Sq. Ft.
33
Additional Consideration
  • Transportation
    • Unable to determine true costs until elementary framework is decided
    • Possible savings minimal (i.e. one bus yields app. $25,000; state regulations; longer routes)
34
Financial Context
  • “The day after passing the last levy was the first day looking towards the next levy.”
35
Continued Focus on Fiscal Responsibility
  • Maintained $6 million in budget reductions
  • Operational review to increase efficiency and identify potential cost savings
  • Ongoing facilities review (Early Childhood Program move from Millikin to Gearity)
36
Five Year Forecast
37
Context Shift
  • State revenue more uncertain that ever before
  • HB 66 changes (loss of tangible personal property tax)
  • Potential loss of Medicaid reimbursement
  • Loss of State $ due to declining enrollment
38
Other Financial Considerations
  • Health care costs, and now utilities, continue to escalate
  • General economy continues to be problematic, particularly where local tax issues are concerned
39
Our Reality
  • Current projections indicate a need for a 9.1 mill levy in calendar 2007
  • $1 million in savings beginning in ’06-’07 reduces the need to a 7.7 mill levy in 2007
  • $2 million in savings beginning in ’06-’07 reduces the need to a 6.4 mill levy in 2007
40
Challenges
  • Constantly balancing the need for cost savings and providing services to our students to continue our tremendous academic gains.
  • Our $6 million budget reduction was kept as far away from the classroom as possible.  Significant additional savings are difficult to achieve without affecting students.
41
Example
  • Approximate annual savings for closing an elementary building - $1.075 million (includes classroom teachers, principal, support staff, utilities…)
42
Summary of Elementary Reconfiguration
  • Borne out of budget reduction process
  • Charge: To be effective AND efficient
  • Process involved stakeholders and received important feedback
  • Recently included Lay Finance Committee
  • Context shifts have impacted thinking and work …….




43
"Enrollment:"
  • Enrollment: Number of students lost in last three years alone is equivalent to the enrollment of our largest building.
  • Personnel: Staffing not aligned to enrollment.
  • Facilities/Operations: Square footage not reflective of changing enrollment.
  • Financial Outlook: Declining enrollment and its effects on personnel, and facilities/operations are not in alignment with the charge to be effective and efficient.  The next levy is being defined now.



44
What We Need:
  • To obtain explicit and clear direction so that we can bring you a specific plan that aligns with your strategic priorities and commitment to fiscal responsibility.
45
Guiding Questions
  • As part of your commitment to fiscal responsibility, is closing a building on the table for serious consideration, understanding that it will result in significant boundary changes?
  • If not, what is?
46
The end…but only a beginning as we head into the future effectively and efficiently!